Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mihai Razvan Marinescu vs Federico Campana Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marinescu vs Campana analysis and find out who is favored!
Mihai Razvan Marinescu vs Federico Campana Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Marinescu 0 - 0 Campana
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marinescu has won 48.43% of points on their second serve, while Campana has won 48.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marinescu, in recent form, has won 52.37% of their opponent's second serve points, while Campana has won 56.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.19% and 39.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marinescu has saved 56.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Campana has saved 54.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marinescu has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 32/ 24), with Campana winning 55% (W/L 33/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marinescu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 101/ 74), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4). Campana has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 113/ 86), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 113/ 86).
- Player level: In the last year, Marinescu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 32/ 24), where as Campana has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.93% of matches (W/L 33/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marinescu has played against opponents with an average rank of 136.73 while Campana has played against players with an average rank of 81.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marinescu has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Campana has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marinescu has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Campana has converted 46.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
57% (105-78)
Career Total W/L
57% (113-86)
56% (14-11)
YTD W/L
54% (13-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mihai Razvan Marinescu vs Federico Campana For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Marinescu VS Campana
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mihai Razvan Marinescu | Federico Campana |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (14/11) | 54% (13/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (32/28) | 55% (29/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (308/271) | 53% (261/231) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (14/11) | 54% (13/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 12 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 66 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:28 | 1:27:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 154.84 | 86.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (791/1206) | 60% (747/1253) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (450/791) | 60% (451/747) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (201/415) | 49% (247/506) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (64/144) | 47% (80/172) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (535/1197) | 46% (588/1279) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 56% (14/11) | 57% (13/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (14/25) | 54% (13/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 100% (13/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 0% (13/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 0% (11/0) |
Mihai Razvan Marinescu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ioan Alexandru Chirita
Player
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
76%
(
68 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ilya Snitari
Player
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
Player
Sebastian Gima
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
52 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
100
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
Player
Simone Agostini
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guy Den Heijer
Player
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
1-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
Player
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Federico Campana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Gabriel Ghetu
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ioan Alexandru Chirita
Player
Federico Campana
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 0-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Cezar Cretu
55%
(
60 of
110)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
3
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
6
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
49%
(
54 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
49 of
93)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Federico Campana
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Michalis Sakellaridis
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriele Bosio
Player
Federico Campana
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Federico Campana
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Federico Campana
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
40%
(
22 of
55)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marinescu Vs Campana Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Marinescu are available here and Campana photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
